Skip to search form Skip to main content You are currently offline. Some features of the site may not work correctly. DOI: Online dating systems are now widely used to search for romance and yet there is little research on how people use these systems to manage their impressions with potential romantic partners. To address this issue we conducted an interview study of 41 online dating users, revealing that-contrary to prior work-online daters largely do not want to intentionally deceive their online dating partners because they think such lies would quickly be discovered face-to-face. View on ACM. Save to Library. Create Alert. Launch Research Feed.
Modern-Dating Impression Management: Your Reaction
Academic journal article Journal of Research in Gender Studies. The adoption of cutting-edge technology constitutes a conventional fashion for users to make contact with romantic partners. Chin et al. Yeo and Fung, Mobile dating applications may function as a way to get in touch with sexual partners, while quite a few of persons who utilize such applications may raise their sexual risk by participating in unprotected intercourse.
Sawyer et al.
Keeping in mind that the modern-dating culture is built on Impression Management, the impressions you paint on women matter. The next.
Include Synonyms Include Dead terms. Peer reviewed Direct link. This article presents an in-class exercise for teaching theories of the presentation of self that is organized around two key concepts, impression management and impression formation. By highlighting the interpretive, interactive aspects of the presentation of self, this exercise is also useful for teaching the major principles of symbolic interactionism. The exercise is a modified form of speed dating in which students are paired together in a rapid succession of brief interactions three to five minutes.
Rather than seeking a date, however, students are participant-observers paying careful attention to how they form impressions of others and manage the impressions others are forming of them. Because of its brief and repeated interactions, speed dating puts students in a good position to observe their interactions with some analytical distance. With this exercise, students become active learners, which has been found to improve engagement and retention.
Drawing on students’ essays, we present evidence that the exercise helps students to develop a basic understanding of presentation-of-self concepts and symbolic interactionism more generally as well as an ability to apply them to their experience. SAGE Publications.
If so, how and why? The struggles were between the ages of 19 and 37, and have been users of the system for time spans ranging from 2 months to 5 years. The chosen online dating system allows strong communication through profile pages and private communication through four different methods: The system allows users to search for public profile pages based on specific demographic criteria, online as management, age, location, and ethnicity.
These searches were filtered based on gender, location, and ethnicity in an management to acquire a diverse pool of interview struggles. There are eight different ethnicity choices on the system: With the location criteria remaining constant within 25 miles , there were 16 different search combinations used for finding interview participants 2 genders x 8 ethnicities. Users were contacted only once, so if their profile was returned in the top 6 search results in a black week, they were skipped and the next new user in the search results was messaged.
Mobile dating applications such as Tinder have exploded in popularity in recent years. On Tinder, impression management begins with a motivation to download.
The full article is available online, and the abstract is below. Matchmaking mobile applications, or dating apps, have become hugely popular in recent years, with millions worldwide swiping through potential romantic partners. The literature on technologically mediated dating has explored how people manage impressions but has rarely taken an autoethnographic perspective: How does the author, both a researcher of dating apps and a user herself, experience self-presentation?
In this paper, I first introduce a theoretical focus on impression management on dating apps. Next, I explain the choice of autoethnography as a method. Drawing from various source materials like personal journaling and chats with matches, I present two autoethnographic pieces: one focusing on my self-presentation as a dating app researcher, and the other on my own dating app use. I follow these by analyzing my motivations and impression construction in the dating app environment, keeping in mind theoretical insights.
I conclude with a discussion into the challenges of an autoethnographic approach to impression management. The full article can be accessed as a PDF. The talk is available on video here the event was in Dutch, but my talk is in English.
This study investigates self-presentation strategies among online dating participants, exploring how participants manage their online presentation of self in order to accomplish the goal of finding a romantic partner. Thirty-four individuals active on a large online dating site participated in telephone interviews about their online dating experiences and perceptions.
The online dating arena represents an opportunity to document changing cultural norms surrounding technology-mediated relationship formation and to gain insight into important aspects of online behavior, such as impression formation and self-presentation strategies.
Abstract: While studying Finnish users of the online dating app Tinder As such, it builds on and advances related work on impression management in the use.
All Rights Reserved. Author’s contact. Journals Linguistic and Philosophical Investigations.
Impression management online dating
Thanks for helping us catch any problems with articles on DeepDyve. We’ll do our best to fix them. Check all that apply – Please note that only the first page is available if you have not selected a reading option after clicking “Read Article”. Include any more information that will help us locate the issue and fix it faster for you.
To address this issue we conducted an interview study of 41 online dating users, revealing that–contrary to prior work–online daters largely do not want to intentionally deceive their online dating partners because they think such lies would quickly be discovered face-to-face. Nevertheless, bad first dates were a norm rather than an exception for this study’s participants.
/Impression Management in Online Dating. Twenty Second European Conference on Information Systems, Tel Aviv 2. 1. Introduction.
Doug Zytko. Sukeshini Grandhi. Quentin Jones. Grandhi there is little work on possibly other forms of Eastern Connecticut State communication in these systems are used for University impression management. This communication reports Willimantic, CT online results from a qualitative study with users grandhis easternct. Online findings from 24 in-depth interviews indicate that primary frustrations with online dating stem from inadequate feedback about conveyed impressions and perceived limitations in forming struggles of others.
We discuss the implications of these findings for improving the design of online dating systems. Author Keywords Online dating; impression management, interaction The author s retain copyright, but ACM receives an exclusive publication license.
Impression Management Dating – Modern-Dating Impression Management: Your Reaction
Keeping in mind that the modern-dating culture is built on Impression Management, the impressions you paint on women matter. The next couple of articles exclusively tackle this series, which virtually impacts all aspects of your interactions. Fact: The dating pool has become more accessible with the introduction of apps and online media.
In online dating, the self-authored profile serves as the primary way for Hall, JA, Pennington, N, Lueders, A () Impression management.
Sign Through. Advanced Search. Article Communication. Close mobile search navigation Article navigation. Volume Article Contents. Literature Review. About the Authors. Managing Impressions Online: Oxford Academic. Google Scholar. Rebecca Heino. Jennifer Gibbs. Split View Views. Cite Citation. Permissions Icon Permissions.
Matchmaking mobile applications, or dating apps, have become hugely popular in recent years, with millions worldwide swiping through potential romantic partners. The literature on technologically mediated dating has explored how people manage impressions but has rarely taken an autoethnographic perspective: How does the author, both a researcher of dating apps and a user herself, experience self-presentation?
In this paper, I first introduce a theoretical focus on impression management on dating apps. Next, I explain the choice of autoethnography as a method.
Abstract. This study investigates self-presentation strategies among online dating participants, exploring how participants manage their online.
HUMAN IT is a multi-disciplinary and scholarly journal with the goal of bringing forth new research and discussion about digital media as communicative, aesthetic, and ludic instruments. We welcome contributions from the humanities, the social, behavioural, and natural sciences, as well as technology. Accepted languages are the Nordic languages and English. Her research and consultancy expertise is in digital communication. She currently researches how people create and manage impressions on digital media, examining mobile dating apps like Tinder.
Font Size. User Username Password Remember me. Abstract People have long used rituals of self-presentation and self-disclosure when looking for a romantic connection, whether they seek a passionate love affair, a spouse or a casual encounter.